Matériau par impression 3D
3D printing, also known as additive manufacturing (AM), refers to processes used to synthesize a 3D object in which successive layers of material are formed under computer control.
À propos de ce matériau
(En anglais seulement) 3D printing, also known as additive manufacturing (AM), refers to processes used to synthesize a 3D object in which successive layers of material are formed under computer control. Objects can be of almost any shape or geometry and are produced from digital 3D models. There are seven categories of AM processes: Binder Jetting, Directed Energy Deposition, Material Extrusion, Material Jetting, Powder Bed Fusion, Sheet Lamination and Vat Photopolymerization. 3D printing materials typically range from plastic to metal. Recently, many research group works on the 3D printing of biomaterials (typically cell-seeded hydrogels) put focus on their use for tissue reconstruction. Mechanical testing can be used at various stages of the process, e.g. in the evaluation of the mechanical properties of the raw material, the mechanical evaluation of the meshing structure and the mechanical evaluation of the 3D printed object.
Configurations de test (20)
Tension
Compression Non-Confinée
Indentation (Raideur)
Friction
Cartographie 3D d'épaisseur
Torsion
Cisaillement
Analyse Mécanique Dynamique
Indentation (dureté)
Profilométrie 2D
Profilométrie 3D

Contrôle de la temperature
Positionnement (manuel angulaire)
Capteurs analogues externes
Corrélation d'images digitales
Flux de caméra
Positionnement (manuel)
Positionnement (X Auto)
Positionnement (XY Auto)
Études de cas (1)

Impression 3D cryogénique d'hydrogels très mous
Vidéothèque
Mapping and analysis · 0:24
Profilométrie 3D d’un plateau tibial SawBone
Démonstration de profilométrie 3D sur un plateau tibial SawBone avec le Mach-1.
Ressources associées (5)
Littérature associée
Gelatin and PLG-based Scaffolds Differentially Support Follicle Integrity and Oocyte Growth in a 3D printed Scaffold
Vasiliki E Mourikes; Claire Joswiak; Sarah Palmer; Ramille N Shah; Monica M Laronda
Research Square. Preprint version 1, posted 4 November 2026. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-11394289/v1
0 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
Technical Feasibility of an Ex Vivo Bovine Trabecular Bone-Titanium Implant Co-Culture Platform for Early Interface Studies
Coralie Nagels; Bianca Riedel; Sunil Shetty; Hagen Schmal; Martin P. Pichotka; Ralf Thomann; Michael Seidenstuecker
Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2026;17(11):538. Published 23 October 2026.
0 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
Normal Human Synovial Fluid Exhibits Stable Hyaluronic Acid and Proteoglycan 4 Levels Across Age and Sex
Lisa Yamaura; Jessica May Corpuz; Joshua Mang; Roman Krawetz
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open, 2026, 100864, ISSN 2665-9131, Published: 20 August 2026
0 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
From Geometry to Function: Programmable Mechanical Response in 3D-Printed Adipose-Inspired Soft Metamaterials
Alice Berardo; Gianmarco Dolino; Damiano Coato; Paolo Gargiulo; Emanuele Luigi Carniel
Advanced Functional Materials (2026): e77047, published: 02 August 2026
2 citations · 2 en 2025–2026
Ionogels Containing Ternary Mixtures of Ionic Liquids and Water in One-Pot Synthesized Poly(Acrylamide-co-HEMA) Matrix
Eric B. Gamboa; Rayan A. M. Basodan; Zhitong Lin; Thuan H. Lu; Byoungyoul Park; Hyun‐Joong Chung
Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 311, no. 7 (2026): e70291, Published: 18 July 2026
0 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
Microsphere‐Templated Conductive Syntactic Foams for Recyclable and Additively Manufactured Soft Electronics
Gayaneh Petrossian; Yassine Diouri; Bolan Xu; Sara Ebrahimi; Atharva Pande; Floriane Miquet‐Westphal; Hang Xu; Fabio Cicoira
Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2026;15(28):e71364.
0 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
Scaffold Material–Architecture Design Rules Linking Mechanics and Early Osteogenesis in PCL/β-TCP Grid, Honeycomb, and Gyroid Lattices
Shweta Thapa; Pete Twigg; Maria Katsikogianni; Dimitra Tsaroucha; Mitali Singhal
ACS Omega. 2026;11(17):25088.
1 citation · 1 en 2025–2026
A Dynamic 3D Human Liver Sinusoid Model for Mechanistic Interrogation of Fontan-Associated Liver Disease
Sarah Rezapourdamanab; Mehdi Salar Amoli; Tanmay Mukherjee; Maryam Bagheri; Boeun Hwang; Linqi Jin; Yamini Singh; Sophia Norton; Ashay Vishwas Bongirwar; Shweta Karnik; Lakshmi Prasad Dasi; Reza Avazmohammadi; Rene Romero; Holly D. Bauser‐Heaton; Vahid Serpooshan
Advanced Science (2026): e24337, Published: 08 April 2026
0 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
High-fidelity ‘top–down’ DLP bioprinting of multi-material soft tissue constructs enabled by computer vision–based layer control
Nadina Usseglio; Alejandro González Santos; Alba Fernández Ferrer; Julián Flores; Daniel Nieto
Biofabrication, PMID: 41871470, Published: 2026 Apr 2
1 citation · 1 en 2025–2026
Mode hybridisation strategies for subwavelength sound attenuation in miniaturised Helmholtz resonators
R. Domingo-Roca; A. Feeney; J. C. Jackson-Camargo; J. F. C. Windmill
Scientific Reports. 2026;16:15638.
0 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
Tuning the Young’s modulus of gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels with masked stereolithography bioprinting
Yasemin A. Geiger; Benedikt K. Kaufmann; Bastian E. Hartmann; Matthias Rudolph; Eduardo Romero Borrero; Andreia Silva; Oliver Hayden; Hauke Clausen-Schaumann; Stefanie Sudhop
Bioprinting, Volume 52, 2025, e00455, ISSN 2405-8866, Published: December 2025
0 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
Synthetic 3D printed tibial plateau with gradient material properties for biomechanical accuracy
Damiano Coato; Gianmarco Dolino; Alice Berardo; Elisa Belluzzi; Assunta Pozzuoli; Pietro Ruggieri; Emanuele Luigi Carniel; Paolo Gargiulo
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2025;13:1707380.
2 citations · 2 en 2025–2026
Dextran-Polydopamine Dual Coating on 3D-Printed Polycaprolactone Scaffolds as a Potential Biofunctionalization Platform for Bone Tissue Engineering
MinJoo Kim; Giles Michael Cheers; Bastian Hartmann; Hauke Clausen-Schaumann; Aldo Roberto Boccaccini; Boris Michael Holzapfel; Susanne Mayer-Wagner
ACS Applied Bio Materials, Vol 8/Issue 10, Published: October 10, 2025
4 citations · 4 en 2025–2026
Multi-objective optimization of an origami inspired super-expandable scaffold for distraction osteogenesis
MA Bagheri; CE Aubin; ML Nault; I Villemure
Materials & Design, Volume 258, 2025, 114620, ISSN 0264-1275, Published: October 2025
0 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
An in silico approach to the mechanical design of meta-materials for adipose tissue engineering
Emanuele Luigi Carniel; Chiara Giulia Fontanella; Maria Vittoria Mascolini; Sofia Pettenuzzo; Ilaria Toniolo; Alice Berardo
Research article, Volume 11, Issue 10e43430, Published: May 2025
2 citations · 2 en 2025–2026
Liquid-bodied antibiofilm robot with switchable viscoelastic response for biofilm eradication on complex surface topographies
Bonan Sun; Junjia Guo; Bo Hao; Yanfei Cao; Tony K. F. Chan; Mengmeng Sun; Joseph J. Y. Sung; Li Zhang
Science Advances. 2025;11(11):eadt8213.
28 citations · 28 en 2025–2026
Mechanical characterization of an origami-inspired super deformable metamaterial with high tunability for tissue engineering
M.A. Bagheri; C.E. Aubin; M.L. Nault; I. Villemure
Materials & Design, Volume 251, 2025, 113701, ISSN 0264-1275, Published: March 2025
10 citations · 10 en 2025–2026
Biomechanically inspired composite hydrogel bioink enhances engineered cartilage formation
Zheyuan Zhou; Fengjie Zhang; Chao Wan
International Journal of Bioprinting 11(2) (2025), 316–335. Published online 15 January 2025. Original abstract: English. Mechanical specimens were cell-free printed hydrogels; recipient mice and cultured chondrocytes are separate biological experiments.
1 citation · 1 en 2025–2026
Development of an on-demand foaming printhead for biofabrication of constructs with heterogeneous porosity
Mohammadamin Zohourfazeli; Pakshid Hosseinzadeh; Elias Madadian; Sara Badr; Sophie Lerouge; Ali Ahmadi
Bioprinting. 2025.
0 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
3D Printing of a Chitosan and Tamarind Gum Ink: a Two-Step Approach
Jeanne Beque; Aurelia Poerio; Mélanie Leroux; Jean-Philippe Jehl; Franck Cleymand
ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2024, Published: November 19, 2024
1 citation · 1 en 2025–2026
Development of photocrosslinkable bioinks with improved electromechanical properties for 3D bioprinting of cardiac BioRings
Ali Mousavi; Ali Hedayatnia; Patrick Piet van Vliet; Daniela Ravizzoni Dartora; Nicholas Wong; Naimeh Rafatian; Anne Monique Nuyt; Christopher Moraes; Abdellah Ajji; Gregor Andelfinger; Houman Savoji
Applied Materials Today, Volume 36, 2024, 102035, ISSN 2352-9407, February 2024
25 citations · 19 en 2025–2026
Single-Step 3D Bioprinting of Alginate-Collagen Type I Hydrogel Fiber Rings to Promote Angiogenic Network Formation
Ying Betty Li; Marina Rukhlova; Dongling Zhang; Jordan Nhan; Caroline Sodja; Erin Bedford; Jean-Philippe St-Pierre; Anna Jezierski
Tissue Engineering Part C: MethodsVol. 30, No. 7, Published Online: 17 July 2024
2 citations · 2 en 2025–2026
Targeted Rapamycin Delivery via Magnetic Nanoparticles to Address Stenosis in a 3D Bioprinted in Vitro Model of Pulmonary Veins
Liqun Ning; Stefano Zanella; Martin L. Tomov; Mehdi Salar Amoli; Linqi Jin; Boeun Hwang; Maher Saadeh; Huang Chen; Sunder Neelakantan; Lakshmi Prasad Dasi; Reza Avazmohammadi; Morteza Mahmoudi; Holly D. Bauser‐Heaton; Vahid Serpooshan
Adv. Sci. 2024, 2400476, published: 02 May 2024
19 citations · 16 en 2025–2026
3D printed protein/polysaccharide food simulant for dysphagia diet: Impact of cellulose nanocrystals
Chi Zhang; Chang-Sheng Wang; Mélanie Girard; Daniel Therriault; Marie-Claude Heuzey
Food Hydrocolloids, Volume 148, Part A, 2024, 109455, ISSN 0268-005X, Published: November 2023
85 citations · 60 en 2025–2026
4D-printing of mechanically durable high-temperature shape memory polymer with good irradiation resistance
Bato Ch. Kholkhoev; Kseniia N. Bardakova; Alena N. Nikishina; Zakhar A. Matveev; Yuri M. Efremov; Anastasia A. Frolova; Anastasiya A. Akovantseva; Elena N. Gorenskaia; Nikolay A. Verlov; Peter S. Timashev; Vitalii F. Burdukovskii
Applied Materials Today, Volume 36, 2024, 102022, ISSN 2352-9407, Published: 2023
21 citations · 10 en 2025–2026
Evaluation of strain in fiber-reinforced synthetic samples using Digital Image Correlation as a result of uniaxial compression experiments [English translation]
Università degli Studi di Padova. Thesis. Academic year . Repository citation year: 2023. Original abstract: Italian.
Fabrication of Piezoelectric Structures with High Porosity by Digital Light Processing
Dongcai Zhang; Yaodong Yang; Xuhan Lv; Wei-Feng Rao
3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers, Published Online: 30 Oct 2023
0 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
FLIM imaging revealed spontaneous osteogenic differentiation of stem cells on gradient pore size tissue-engineered constructs
Svetlana Rodimova; Artem Mozherov; Vadim Elagin; Maria Karabut; Ilya Shchechkin; Dmitry Kozlov; Dmitry Krylov; Alena Gavrina; Vladislav Kaplin; Evgenii Epifanov; Nikita Minaev; Ksenia Bardakova; Anna Solovieva; Peter Timashev; Elena Zagaynova; Daria Kuznetsova
Stem Cell Research & Therapy volume 14, Article number: 81 (2023), Published: 12 April 2023
7 citations · 6 en 2025–2026
Leveraging 3D Bioprinting and Photon-Counting Computed Tomography to Enable Noninvasive Quantitative Tracking of Multifunctional Tissue Engineered Constructs
Carmen J. Gil; Connor J. Evans; Lan Li; Alex J. Allphin; Martin L. Tomov; Linqi Jin; Merlyn Vargas; Boeun Hwang; Jing Wang; Victor Putaturo; Gabriella Kabboul; Anjum S. Alam; Roshni K. Nandwani; Yuxiao Wu; Asif Sushmit; Travis Fulton; Ming Shen; Jarred M. Kaiser; Liqun Ning; Remi Veneziano; Nick Willet; Ge Wang; Hicham Drissi; Eric R. Weeks; Holly D. Bauser‐Heaton; Cristian T. Badea; Ryan K. Roeder; Vahid Serpooshan
Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2023, 2302271, Published: 14 September 2023
18 citations · 11 en 2025–2026
Three-Dimensional Printing of Protein/Polysaccharide Mixed Gel Systems for Food Applications
Polytechnique Montréal. PhD thesis, August2023. Original abstract: English.
Validating Stiffness of Bovine Trabecular Bone Cores from FEA Simulations in Abaqus with 3D Printed Models
Roxolana Smyk; Kail Beloglowka; Alexander Hadwen; McKinley Van Klei; Lauren Windover; Heidi-Lynn Ploeg
Orthopaedic Research Society Annual Meeting, 2023. Conference poster, Queen’s University.
3D bioprinting of nanoparticle-laden hydrogel scaffolds with enhanced antibacterial and imaging properties
Andrea S. Theus; Liqun Ning; Gabriella Kabboul; Boeun Hwang; Martin L. Tomov; Christopher N. LaRock; Holly Bauser-Heaton; Morteza Mahmoudi; Vahid Serpooshan
ISCIENCE (2022), doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104947, Accepted Date: 11 August 2022
34 citations · 15 en 2025–2026
A novel workflow to fabricate a patient-specific 3D printed accommodative foot orthosis with personalized latticed metamaterial
Yuri F Hudak; Jing-Sheng Li; Scott Cullum; Brian M Strzelecki; Chris Richburg; G Eli Kaufman; Daniel Abrahamson; Jeffrey T. Heckman; Beth Ripley; Scott Telfer; William R Ledoux; Brittney C Muir; Patrick M Aubin
Medical Engineering & Physics, Volume 104, 2022, 103802, ISSN 1350-4533, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103802.
53 citations · 33 en 2025–2026
Development of aqueous protein/polysaccharide mixture-based inks for 3D printing towards food applications
Chi Zhang; Chang-Sheng Wang; Daniel Therriault; Marie-Claude Heuzey
Food Hydrocolloids. 2022.
72 citations · 32 en 2025–2026
Extracellular Matrix Microparticles Improve GelMA Bioink Resolution for 3D Bioprinting at Ambient Temperature
Zachary Galliger; Caleb D. Vogt; Haylie R. Helms; Angela Panoskaltsis‐Mortari
Macromolecular Materials and Engineering published by Wiley-VCH GmbH, First published: 21 July 2022
30 citations · 14 en 2025–2026
Magnetic Nanoparticle Targeting of a 3D Bioprinted Model of Pulmonary Vasculature to Address Restenosis
Georgia Tech Theses and Dissertations, Approved: November 30, 2022 , published: Dec2022
Methacrylate-Modified Gold Nanoparticles Enable Non-Invasive Monitoring of Photocrosslinked Hydrogel Scaffolds
Lan Li; Carmen J. Gil; Tyler A. Finamore; Connor J. Evans; Martin L. Tomov; Liqun Ning; Andrea Theus; Gabriella Kabboul; Vahid Serpooshan; Ryan K. Roeder
bioRxiv, Preprint, Published: January 28, 2022 doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.26.477960
1 citation · 0 en 2025–2026
Printing Structurally Anisotropic Biocompatible Fibrillar Hydrogel for Guided Cell Alignment
Zhengkun Chen; Nancy Khuu; Fei Xu; Sina Kheiri; Ilya Yakavets; Faeze Rakhshani; Sofia Morozova; Eugenia Kumacheva
University of Toronto, TSpace Repository Faculty Publications MDPI, Published: 22Oct2022
19 citations · 9 en 2025–2026
Strain field evaluation during tensile tests through the application of Digital Image Correlation [English translation]
Università degli Studi di Padova. Thesis. Academic year . Repository citation year: 2022. Original abstract: Italian.
Thermosensitive chitosan-based hydrogels for extrusion-based bioprinting and injectable scaffold for articular tissue engineering
Université de Montréal. PhD thesis in Biomedical Engineering, February 2022. Original abstract: English. Mechanical specimens were printed or molded hydrogels; human MSC and mouse fibroblast culture experiments are separate.
Bio-printed, bio-functionalized PLGA-KGN scaffolds as an augmentation to microfracture
Thesis, 2021. DOI: 10.54718/mbkg3769
0 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
A 3D Bioprinted In Vitro Model of Human Liver for the Study of Liver Fibrosis
Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University. Master of Science thesis,August2021. Original abstract: English.
A 3D Bioprinted In Vitro Model of Pulmonary Artery Atresia to Evaluate Endothelial Cell Response to Microenvironment
Martin L. Tomov; Lilanni Perez; Liqun Ning; Huang Chen; Bowen Jing; Andrew Mingee; Sahar Ibrahim; Andrea S. Theus; Gabriella Kabboul; Katherine Do; Sai Raviteja Bhamidipati; Jordan Fischbach; Kevin McCoy; Byron A. Zambrano; Jianyi Zhang; Reza Avazmohammadi; Athanasios Mantalaris; Brooks D. Lindsey; David Frakes; Lakshmi Prasad Dasi; Vahid Serpooshan; Holly Bauser‐Heaton
Advanced Healthcare Materials, First published: 08 August 2021
32 citations · 13 en 2025–2026
Development of bioinks for 3D printing microporous, sintered calcium phosphate scaffolds
Sergio A. Montelongo; Gennifer Chiou; Joo L. Ong; Rena Bizios; Teja Guda
Journal of Materials Science. Materials in Medicine. 2021;32(8):94.
30 citations · 12 en 2025–2026
Impact of the rheological properties and the extrusion parameters on the printed structures [English translation]
École de technologie supérieure. Master’s thesis, 17 August 2021. Official English translated title. Original abstract: English.
Light-based bioprinting for fabricating vascularized tissues
PhD Thesis, 2021. Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
Multifunctional 3D-Printed Wound Dressings
Moien Alizadehgiashi; Carine R. Nemr; Mahshid Chekini; Daniel Pinto Ramos; Nitesh Mittal; Sharif U. Ahmed; Nancy Khuu; Shana O. Kelley; Eugenia Kumacheva
ACS Nano 2021, 15, 7, 12375–12387 Publication Date:June 16, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c04499
233 citations · 74 en 2025–2026
Study of In-Plane Mechanical Behavior of Bio-Inspired Hierarchical Honeycombs
University of Louisiana at Lafayette, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2021. 28494326.
Tunable metacrylated hyaluronic acid-based hybrid bioinks for stereolithography 3D bioprinting
Rafaeal Hossain Rakin; Hitendra Kumar; Ashna Rajeev; Giovanniantonio Natale; Frederic Menard; Isaac T S Li; Keekyoung Kim
Biofabrication, Published 27 September 2021. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac25cb.
74 citations · 29 en 2025–2026
A rheological approach to assess the printability of thermosensitive chitosan-based biomaterial inks
Maedeh Rahimnejad; Thierry Labonté-Dupuis; Nicole R Demarquette; Sophie Lerouge
Biomedical Materials, Accepted Manuscript online 26 August 2020 • © 2020 IOP Publishing Ltd
46 citations · 19 en 2025–2026
Biomechanics of Tissue Engineered Cartilage Produced Using 3D Printing and Bioprinting
Thomas J. Kean; Remi Dagenais; Sotcheadt Sim
Orthopaedic Research Society (ORS), 2020, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Poster
Embedded 3D Bioprinting of Gelatin Methacryloyl-Based Constructs with Highly Tunable Structural Fidelity
Liqun Ning; Riya Mehta; Cong Cao; Andrea Theus; Martin Tomov; Ning Zhu; Eric R. Weeks; Holly Bauser-Heaton; Vahid Serpooshan
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, XXXX, Publication Date: September 23, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c15078
165 citations · 49 en 2025–2026
Engineering of Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA) Hydrogels for Developing Biomimetic Tissue Constructs
University of Calgary. PhD thesis, October 2020. Original abstract: English.
Stereolithography 3D Bioprinting Method for Fabrication of Human Corneal Stroma Equivalent
S. Sharareh Mahdavi; Mohammad J. Abdekhodaie; Hitendra Kumar; Shohreh Mashayekhan; Alireza Baradaran-Rafii; Keekyoung Kim
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Biomaterials - Engineering Cell Behavior, Published: 05 June 2020
145 citations · 47 en 2025–2026
GO-Modified flexible polymer nanocomposites fabricated via 3D stereolithography
Chi Him Alpha Tsang; Adilet Zhakeyev; Dennis Y. C. Leung; Jin Xuan
Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-019-1836-x
41 citations · 18 en 2025–2026
On-Demand Radial Electrodeposition of Alginate Tubular Structures
David M. Kingsley; Jared A. Capuano; David T. Corr
ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. Publication Date:June 12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00415
9 citations · 1 en 2025–2026
Osteochondral Repair and Electromechanical Evaluation of Custom 3D Scaffold Microstructured by Direct Laser Writing Lithography
Justinas Maciulaitis; Milda Miskiniene; Sima Rekštytė; Maksim Bratchikov; Adas Darinskas; Agne Simbelyte; Gintaras Daunoras; Aida Laurinaviciene; Arvydas Laurinavicius; Rimtautas Gudas; Mangirdas Malinauskas; Romaldas Maciulaitis
Cartilage · May 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/1947603519847745
5 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
Visible Light Photoinitiation of Cell Adhesive Gelatin Methacryloyl Hydrogels for Stereolithography 3D Bioprinting
Zongjie Wang; Hitendra Kumar; Zhenlin Tian; Xian Jin; Jonathan F. Holzman; Frederic Menard; Keekyoung Kim
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, Just Accepted Manuscript DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b06607 Publication Date (Web): July 19, 2018
271 citations · 46 en 2025–2026
Comparative study of gelatin methacrylate hydrogels from different sources for biofabrication applications
Zongjie Wang; Zhenlin Tian; Fredric Menard; Keekyoung Kim
Biofabrication, Volume 9, Number 4, Published 21 August 2017 © 2017 IOP Publishing
133 citations · 20 en 2025–2026
Impression 3D cryogénique d’hydrogels très mous
Zhengchu Tan; Cristian Parisi; Lucy Di Silvio; Daniele Dini; Antonio Elia Forte
Scientific Reports 7, Article number: 16293 (2017) doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16668-9
153 citations · 24 en 2025–2026
Characterization of tissue engineered cartilage products - Recent developments in advanced therapy
Justinas Mačiulaitis; Sima Rekštytė; Arvydas Ūsas; Virginija Jankauskaitė; Rimtautas Gudas; Mangirdas Malinauskas; Romaldas Mačiulaitis
Pharmacological Research 113 (2016) 823–832
10 citations · 1 en 2025–2026
Three-dimensional bioprinting of complex cell laden alginate hydrogel structures
Atabak Ghanizadeh Tabriz; Miguel A Hermida; Nicholas R Leslie; Wenmiao Shu
Biofabrication. 2015.
395 citations · 37 en 2025–2026
Elastic modulus of 316 stainless steel lattice structure fabricated via binder jetting process
Y. Tang; Y. Zhou; T. Hoff; M. Garon; Y. F. Zhao
Materials Science and Technology 32(7):1743284715Y.000 · June 2015 DOI: 10.1179/1743284715Y.0000000084
71 citations · 8 en 2025–2026
The Verification of the Mechanical Properties of Binder Jetting Manufactured Parts by Instrumented Indentation Testing
Yuhaowei Zhou; Yunlong Tang; Thibault Hoff; Martin Garon; Fiona Yaoyao Zhao
Procedia Manufacturing. 2015;1:327–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.09.038
28 citations · 5 en 2025–2026
Growth Factor Stimulation Improves the Structure and Properties of Scaffold-Free Engineered Auricular Cartilage Constructs
Renata G. Rosa; Paulo P. Joazeiro; Juares Bianco; Manuela Kunz; Joanna F. Weber; Stephen D. Waldman
PLoS ONE 9(8): e105170. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105170. (2014)
37 citations · 2 en 2025–2026
Development of large engineered cartilage constructs from a small population of cells
Jillian M. Brenner; Manuela Kunz; Man Yat Tse; Andrew Winterborn; Davide D. Bardana; Stephen C. Pang; Stephen D. Waldman
Biotechnology progress, 29(1), 213-221. (2013)
25 citations · 2 en 2025–2026
FAQ
Qu'est-ce que le module d'Young E?+
Module de laboratoire — Compression non confinée de disques d’hydrogel
Comment fonctionne le modèle élastique en indentation "Elastic Model in Indentation"?+
(En anglais seulement) This tool allows for the computing and visualizing of the shear modulus (MPa) and the Young’s modulus (MPa) from an indentation test performed using a spherical indenter (Figure 1). This model is well adapted for the mechanical characterization of samples (with critical diameter (width) at least 5 times the indenter diameter) bonded on a flat rigid support (at least 10 times stiffer than the sample), for example: any sheet of material lying on a rigid chamber base (limited sliding at the interface can be assumed) or a cartilage layer attached to a thick sub-chondral bone. A user license is required to obtain the results of the elastic model in indentation (Software Add-On, contact Biomomentum to obtain your license).
Results analysis is performed considering the indentation mechanics of an infinitely wide elastic layer bonded to a rigid half-space which has been developed as a model for the layered geometry of cartilage and subchondral bone (Hayes et al., 1972). (Figure 2) shows a schematic representing the modeled situation.
Many parameters need to be specified in order to calculate the different material properties.
1. Indenter Shape is:
- Spherical
- Plane-Ended Cylindrical
2. Indenter radius in mm.
3. Poisson ratio can be selected from a drop-down list (Figure 3)
4. Position @ contact is – defines the position of the left cursor:
- to be curvefit – will automatically find the position contact which will give the smallest mean squared error (mse)
- the value at t0 – will automatically take the position contact at the start of the curve
- the following value (mm) – the user need to specify the value in the corresponding field next to the drop-down list
- cursor position – the user can drag the left cursor to the wanted position contact
5. Sample thickness is the:
- position @ contact – will automatically find the position at contact (position of the left cursor)
- following value (mm) – the user need to specify the value in the corresponding field next to the drop-down list
6. Curvefit is up to – defines the position of the right cursor:
- peak load – will automatically take the position of the peak load
- delta load (unit) – the user need to specify the value of the desired delta load in the corresponding field next to the drop-down list
- delta position (mm) – the user need to specify the value of the desired delta position in the corresponding field next to the drop-down list
The error on the estimation of the best curve representing the stress relaxation curve is calculated using the root of the mean squares (RMS) method and is displayed under “mse”. For example, (Figure 4) shows parameters used for the “Normal Indentation” (Mach-1 Motion) function in an indentation testing protocol on ovine articular surfaces. Corresponding results are shown in (Figure 1).
Spherical Indentation Guide – Mach-1 Mechanical Tester – Biomomentum
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle élastique en Indentation – Paramètres
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle élastique en indentation – Poisson ratio choix
Mach-1 Analysis-Modèle élastique dans l’indentation–Cartilage & os sous-chondral
Comment fonctionne le modèle "Sinusoid"? +
(En anglais seulement) This feature is used to obtain the Frequency, Amplitude and Offset of a sinusoidal signal. A blue line displays the theoretical sinusoid with the Frequency, Amplitude and Offset obtained (Figure 1). The values of the Frequency, Amplitude and Offset are indicated in the "Results" field. The units vary according to the graph’s axes.
This feature can also be used for sinusoidal stimulus-response analysis. Sinusoidal stimulus shall be selected on the x-axis and the sinusoidal response on the y-axis. The Modulus is the ratio of the response Amplitude over the stimulus Amplitude. The Phase is the phase difference between the response and the stimulus. The Modulus’ is computed as the Modulus*Cos(Phase) and the Modulus” is computed as the Modulus*Sin(Phase). A blue line displays the theoretical sinusoidal stimulus-response with the Frequency, Modulus and Phase obtained (Figure 2). The values of the Modulus and Phase are indicated in the “Results” field. The units vary according to the graph’s axes.
One use for this feature would be to compute material properties by multiplying the Modulus obtained by the appropriate geometric factors. For example, the Young’s Modulus can be obtained during uniaxial compression or tension on cylindrical sample with t/pi*r2 as the geometric factor, t is the thickness and r is the radius of the sample.
Mach-1 Analysis – Sinusoid – Exemple d’analyse stimulus-réponse
Qu'est-ce que la viscoélasticité?+
LAB MODULE – Torsion of Disk-Shaped Samples – Student Version
Qu'est-ce que l'élasticité?+
Module de laboratoire — Torsion de l’os
LAB MODULE – Unconfined Compression of Hydrogel Disks – Student Version
