Aller au contenu

Tunable metacrylated hyaluronic acid-based hybrid bioinks for stereolithography 3D bioprinting

  • par garon@biomomentum.com

Rafaeal Hossain Rakin; Hitendra Kumar; Ashna Rajeev; Giovanniantonio Natale; Frederic Menard; Isaac T S Li; Keekyoung Kim
Biofabrication, Published 27 September 2021. .

https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac25cb

74 citations · 29 en 2025–2026

Les titres, résumés et légendes des publications sont présentés en anglais.

Abstract
Hyaluronic acid is a native extra-cellular matrix derivative that promises unique properties, such as anti-inflammatory response and cell-signaling with tissue-specific applications under its bioactive properties. Here, we investigate the importance of the duration of synthesis to obtain photocrosslinkable methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA) with high degree of substitution. MeHA with high degree of substitution can result in rapid photocrosslinking and can be used as a bioink for stereolithographic (SLA) three dimensional 3D bioprinting. Increased degree of substitution results Our findings show that a ten-day synthesis results in an 88% degree of methacrylation (DM), whereas three-day and five-day syntheses result in 32% and 42% DM, respectively. The rheological characterization revealed an increased rate of photopolymerization with increasing DM. Further, we developed a hybrid bioink to overcome the non-cell-adhesive nature of MeHA by combining it with gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) to fabricate 3D cell-laden hydrogel scaffolds. The hybrid bioink exhibited a 55% enhancement in stiffness compared to MeHA only and enabled cell-adhesion while maintaining high cell viability. Investigations also revealed that the hybrid bioink was a more suitable candidate for stereolithography (SLA) 3D bioprinting than MeHA because of its mechanical strength, printability, and cell-adhesive nature. This research lays out a firm foundation for the development of a stable hybrid bioink with MeHA and GelMA for first-ever use with SLA 3D bioprinting.

Utilisation des équipements

Le résumé disponible traite de comparaisons de rigidité entre des bioencres à base d’acide hyaluronique méthacrylé et des bioencres hybrides MeHA–GelMA destinées à la bio-impression par stéréolithographie. Il ne précise ni l’appareil ni la méthode d’évaluation de la rigidité. Les essais d’indentation et le rôle d’un Mach-1 Mechanical Tester restent donc à vérifier.

Article et documents

Matériaux (2)

Configurations de test (1)

Découvrez la recherche en pratique

Découvrez les études de cas

Report a problem with this page

Your email is used only to follow up on this report.

Screenshots (optional)

Click this area and paste a screenshot, or drag files here. Up to 3 PNG, JPEG or WebP images; 5 MB per image. Hide confidential information first.

Please do not include passwords or customer information. Reports and screenshots are private.