Aller au contenu

Comparative study of gelatin methacrylate hydrogels from different sources for biofabrication applications

  • par garon@biomomentum.com

Zongjie Wang; Zhenlin Tian; Fredric Menard; Keekyoung Kim
Biofabrication, Volume 9, Number 4, Published 21 August 2017 © 2017 IOP Publishing

https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa83cf

133 citations · 20 en 2025–2026

Les titres, résumés et légendes des publications sont présentés en anglais.

Gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) hydrogel is a promising bioink for biofabrication applications due to its cost-effectiveness, ease of synthesis and biocompatibility to allow cell adhesion. However, the GelMA synthesized from a widely used porcine skin gelatin has a thermal gelation problem at room temperature. Here, we present thermally stable GelMA hydrogels at room temperature while maintaining the mechanical and biological properties comparable to porcine GelMA. The novel GelMA hydrogels were synthesized from fish skin and cold soluble gelatin. We systematically characterized the properties of the GelMA hydrogels from different sources. The properties include the degree of methacrylation, compressive Young's modulus, mass swelling ratio, viscosity, and cell adhesion and proliferation in 2D and 3D microenvironments. It has been found that the cold soluble GelMA was comparable to the porcine skin GelMA but could offer low viscosity and thermal stability at room temperature. We performed a droplet generation experiment to demonstrate the benefit of using the cold soluble GelMA for biofabrication. The cold soluble GelMA showed a more reliable and stable droplet fabrication process. Taken together, the cold soluble GelMA is a promising bioink solution and may greatly benefit the research in biofabrication.

Utilisation des équipements

L’étude caractérisait des hydrogels de méthacrylate de gélatine issus de peau porcine, de peau de poisson et de gélatine soluble à froid pour la biofabrication. Le module de Young en compression figurait parmi les propriétés mesurées. Le résumé disponible n’identifie pas l’instrument de compression ni les conditions de confinement; le rôle du Mach-1 Mechanical Tester et un protocole de compression non confinée ne peuvent être vérifiés.

Matériaux (2)

Configurations de test (1)

Découvrez la recherche en pratique

Découvrez les études de cas

Report a problem with this page

Your email is used only to follow up on this report.

Screenshots (optional)

Click this area and paste a screenshot, or drag files here. Up to 3 PNG, JPEG or WebP images; 5 MB per image. Hide confidential information first.

Please do not include passwords or customer information. Reports and screenshots are private.