Cartilage auriculaire
Auricular cartilage is the cartilage of the outermost portion of the ear.
À propos de ce matériau
Le cartilage auriculaire est le cartilage de la partie la plus externe de l’oreille. Il s’agit d’un tissu conjonctif flexible qui a de nombreuses applications en particulier pour la reconstruction faciale ainsi qu’en rhinoplastie. Les propriétés mécaniques du cartilage auriculaire sont essentielles pour la reconstruction nasale et pour le développement de constructions tissulaires pour imiter le tissu natif.
Configurations de test (16)
Tension
Compression Non-Confinée
Indentation (Raideur)
Friction
Cartographie 3D d'épaisseur
Torsion
Cisaillement
Compression confinée

Contrôle de la temperature
Positionnement (manuel angulaire)
Capteurs analogues externes
Flux de caméra
Positionnement (manuel)
Positionnement (X Auto)
Positionnement (XY Auto)
Ressources associées (10)
Littérature associée
Tissue-Engineered Osteochondral Allograft Versus Fresh Osteochondral Allograft: Comparable Cartilage and Subchondral Bone Repair in a 14-Month Equine Osteochondral Defect Model
Laura E. Keller; Terri-Ann N. Kelly; Jacqueline M. Chevalier; Hyung Jin Jung; Garett B. Pearson; Laila Begum; Olivia S. Beane; Sarindr Bhumiratana; Lisa A. Fortier
The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2026;54(3):622-634, published: February 10, 2026
1 citation · 1 en 2025–2026
Elastase-Treated Auricular Cartilage: Feasibility as a Substitute for Native Tarsus
Elana Meer; Kendall Goodyear; Joseph Park; Somaye Jafari; Kanish Mirchia; Joseph Demer; Justin Karlin
Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery ():10.1097/IOP.0000000000003103, Published: January 12, 2026
0 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
In Vitro Impact Model to Generate Sublethal Chondrocyte Injury in Bovine Cartilage Explants
Taylor Williams; Sogol Younesi; Hessam Noori-Dokht; Abigail Hair; Sonali J. Karnik; Amin Joukar; Diane R. Wagner
J. Vis. Exp. (220), e68061, Published: June 27th, 2025
0 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
The Relationship Between the Optical Properties of Articular Cartilage and the Biomechanical Parameters of the Tissue
Iman Kafian‐Attari; Mohammad Ebrahimi; Ervin Nippolainen; Arash Mirhashemi; Petri Paakkari; Florian Bergmann; Florian Foschum; Alwin Kienle; Juha Töyräs; Isaac Afara
J. Biophotonics e202400460, First published: 31 January 2025
1 citation · 1 en 2025–2026
Hyperelastic constitutive modeling of healthy and enzymatically mediated degraded articular cartilage
Asif Istiak; Saiful Islam; Malek Adouni; Tanvir R. Faisal
Biomech Model Mechanobiol (2025), Published: 19 January 2025
5 citations · 5 en 2025–2026
Age and Gender Related Variability in the Strength of Auricular Cartilage in Living Humans
Fuat Buyuklu; Mert Poyraz Cakmak; Berk Ayaz Cakmak; Elif Durukan; Evren Hizal
Aesth Plast Surg (2024)., Published: 18 November 2024
3 citations · 3 en 2025–2026
Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis: studies on robustness and acceleration of quantitative imaging
Publications of the University of Eastern Finland. Dissertations in Science, Forestry and Technology, 49 ISSN: 2954-1484 ISBN: 978-952-61-5272-1
0 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
Site-specific elastic and viscoelastic biomechanical properties of healthy and osteoarthritic human knee joint articular cartilage
Awuniji Linus; Petri Tanska; Ervin Nippolainen; Virpi Tiitu; Juha Töyras; Rami K. Korhonen; Isaac O. Afara; Mika E. Mononen
Journal of Biomechanics, Volume 169, 2024, 112135, ISSN 0021-9290, Published: May2024
13 citations · 13 en 2025–2026
Tissue Engineering Auricular Cartilage: A Review of Auricular Cartilage Characteristics and Current Techniques for Auricular Reconstruction
Nawal Khan; Daniel P. Zaki; Wendy E. Brown; Faris F. Halaseh; Dominique Willette; Mary Ziegler; Kyriacos A. Athanasiou; Alan D. Widgerow
Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38441206, J Craniofac Surg . 2024 Mar 5
13 citations · 12 en 2025–2026
3D Bioprinting Pediatric Trachea
University of Minnesota ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2022. 29061701, Published: February 2022
A defined road to tracheal reconstruction: laser structuring and cell support for rapid clinic translation
Alexey Fayzullin; Georgiy Vladimirov; Anastasia Kuryanova; Elvira Gafarova; Sergei Tkachev; Nastasia Kosheleva; Elena Istranova; Leonid Istranov; Yuri Efremov; Ivan Novikov; Polina Bikmulina; Kirill Puzakov; Pavel Petrov; Ivan Vyazankin; Andrey Nedorubov; Tatyana Khlebnikova; Valentina Kapustina; Pavel Trubnikov; Nikita Minaev; Aleksandr Kurkov; Valery Royuk; Vasily Mikhailov; Dmitriy Parshin; Anna Solovieva; Marina Lipina; Alexey Lychagin; Peter Timashev; Andrey Svistunov; Victor Fomin; Anastasia Shpichka
BMC, Stem Cell Research & Therapy volume 13, Article number: 317 (2022), Published: 16 July 2022
13 citations · 4 en 2025–2026
Augmentation and vocal fold biomechanics in a recurrent laryngeal nerve injury model
Solaleh Miar; Benjamin Walters; Gabriela Gonzales; Ronit Malka; Amelia Baker; Teja Guda; Gregory R. Dion
Wiley Online Library, Original Research, Published: 06 July 2022
7 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
Magnetic Micro-Driller System for Nasolacrimal Duct Recanalization
Haojin Yang; Zhengxin Yang; Dongdong Jin; Lin Su; Kai-Fung Chan; Kelvin Kam-Lung Chong; Chi Pui Pang; Li Zhang
Published: 13 June 2022
17 citations · 9 en 2025–2026
Mechanical characterization of articular cartilage degraded combinedly with MMP-1 and MMP-9
Allison Mixon; Ahmed Suparno Bahar-Moni; Tanvir R. Faisal
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, Volume 129, 2022, 105131, ISSN 1751-6161, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105131.
20 citations · 10 en 2025–2026
Comparison of the compressive mechanical properties of auricular and costal cartilage from patients with microtia
M.F. Griffin; G. O'Toole; W. Sabbagh; M. Szarko; P.E. Butler
Journal of Biomechanics, Available online 25 February 2020, 109688 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109688
33 citations · 9 en 2025–2026
Quantifying vocal fold wound‐healing biomechanical property changes
Gregory R. Dion; Teja Guda; Shigeyuki Mukudai; Renjie Bing; Jean‐Francois Lavoie; Ryan C. Branski
Laryngoscope. 2019 May 6. doi: 10.1002/lary.27999
13 citations · 6 en 2025–2026
Optimising the decellularization of human elastic cartilage with trypsin for future use in ear reconstruction
Shafiq Rahman; Michelle Griffin; Anish Naik; Matthew Szarko; Peter E. M. Butler
Scientific Reports (2018) 8:3097 DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-20592-x
82 citations · 16 en 2025–2026
Comparisons of Auricular Cartilage Tissues from Different Species
Loraine L.Y. Chiu; Renata Giardini-Rosa; Joanna F. Weber; Sharon L. Cushing; Stephen D. Waldman
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2017 Dec;126(12):819-828. doi: 10.1177/0003489417738789. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
33 citations · 4 en 2025–2026
Biomechanical Characterisation of the Human Auricular Cartilage - Implications for Tissue Engineering
M. F. Griffin; Y. Premakumar; A. M. Seifalian; M. Szarko; P. E. M. Butler
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2016. Punlished online, 14Jul2016. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-016-1688-1
80 citations · 15 en 2025–2026
Bioengineering Human Scaffold-free Cartilage Constructs Using Paediatric Auricular Tissue
MSc thesis, University of Toronto, 2015 (degree/title-page year).
0 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
Development of scaffold-free elastic cartilaginous constructs with structural similarities to auricular cartilage
Renata Giardini-Rosa; Paulo P. Joazeiro; Kathryn Thomas; Kristina Collavino; Joanna Weber; Stephen D. Waldman
Tissue Engineering Part A. Volume 20, Numbers 5 and 6, 2014, pp 1012-26 (2014)
25 citations · 3 en 2025–2026
Growth Factor Stimulation Improves the Structure and Properties of Scaffold-Free Engineered Auricular Cartilage Constructs
Renata G. Rosa; Paulo P. Joazeiro; Juares Bianco; Manuela Kunz; Joanna F. Weber; Stephen D. Waldman
PLoS ONE 9(8): e105170. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105170. (2014)
37 citations · 2 en 2025–2026
25th Anniversary Article: Engineering Hydrogels for Biofabrication
Jos Malda; Jetze Visser; Ferry P. Melchels; Tomasz Jüngst; Wim E. Hennink; Wouter J. A. Dhert; Jürgen Groll; Dietmar W. Hutmacher
Adv. Mater., 25: 5011–5028. doi:10.1002/adma.201302042 (2013)
1903 citations · 220 en 2025–2026
A fibril-network-reinforced biphasic model of cartilage in unconfined compression
J. Soulhat; M. D. Buschmann; A. Shirazi-Adl
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Jun, 121(3), 340-347. (1999)
250 citations · 9 en 2025–2026
FAQ
Qu'est-ce que la poroelasticité?+
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle poroélastique en compression non-confinée – Paramètres
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle poroélastique en compression confinée – Paramètres
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle poroélastique en compression confinée – Exemple
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle poroélastique en compression non-confinée – Cartilage
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle poroélastique en compression non-confinée – Exemple
LAB MODULE – Torsion of Disk-Shaped Samples – Student Version
Comment fonctionne le modèle poroélastique en compression confinée "Poroelastic Model in Confined Compression"?+
This model is well adapted for the mechanical characterization of samples containing a liquid fraction and a solid matrix, for example: cartilage or gel samples. A user license is required in order to obtain the results of the poroelastic model in confined compression (Software Add-On, contact Biomomentum to obtain your license).
Mechanical properties can be obtained from the stress relaxation curves obtained under confined compression such as the aggregate modulus (HA) and the hydraulic permeability (k). The aggregate modulus is a measure of stiffness of the sample at equilibrium while the hydraulic permeability is the ability of the fluid to flow through the cartilage matrix.
For example, (Figure 2) shows parameters used for the “Stress Relaxation” function in a confined compression testing protocol on human cartilage disks. Corresponding results are shown in (Figure 1).
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle poroélastique en compression confinée – Paramètres
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle poroélastique en compression confinée – Exemple
Comment fonctionne le modèle poroélastique en compression non-confinée "Poroelastic Model in Unconfined Compression"?+
The nonhomogeneous composite model (i.e. linear fibril-network-reinforced biphasic model) is an extension of the previously developed isotropic homogeneous biphasic model, and was achieved by reinforcing the latter with a network of nonlinear fibrils distributed homogeneously in the r, θ, z directions and which resist extension only (Figure 2). The isotropic matrix is described by the drained elastic constants Em (Young’s modulus), vm(Poisson’s ratio) and a hydraulic permeability k. The fibril network is described by the Young’s modulus of individual fibrils ef which, combined with a fibril volume fraction χ (fibrils volume/ total-volume), results in an equivalent tensile modulus of the fibril network, Ef = 1/3 χ ef (since 1/3 of the fibrils are oriented in each of three mutually orthogonal directions).
For example, (Figure 3) shows parameters used for the “Stress Relaxation” function in an unconfined compression testing protocol on ovine cartilage disks. Corresponding results are shown in (Figure 1).
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle poroélastique en compression non-confinée – Paramètres
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle poroélastique en compression non-confinée – Cartilage
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle poroélastique en compression non-confinée – Exemple
