Cartilage articulaire (TMJ)
Articular surfaces of the temporomandibular joints are covered by cartilage.
À propos de ce matériau
(En anglais seulement) Articular surfaces of the temporomandibular joints are covered by cartilage. Temporomandibular joints connect the lower jaw to the skull and regulates the movement of the jaw. Mechanical properties of the articular cartilage of temporomandibular joints are studies to learn about: its structural function in the body, the effects of pathologies in TMJ mechanics and related clinical issues, development of engineered construct of articular cartilage of TMJ, research in articular cartilage of TMJ physiology.
Configurations de test (12)
Compression Non-Confinée
Indentation (Raideur)
Friction
Cartographie 3D d'épaisseur
Torsion
Cisaillement
Compression confinée

Contrôle de la temperature
Positionnement (manuel angulaire)
Capteurs analogues externes
Flux de caméra
Ressources associées (13)
Littérature associée
Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 and Cabozantinib for Temporomandibular Joint Cartilage Repair: Murine and Porcine Injury Models
Max L. Silverstein; Sophia Hou; Chunxi Ge; Tanya C. Garcia; Charles K. F. Chan; Karl C. Bruckman; Eri Takematsu
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(19), 8937; Published: 7 October 2026
0 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
557 - Investigating PRG4 Re-expression as a Treatment for TMJ Degenerative Diseases
Po-Jung Chen; Paige Woods; Adam Tanguay; Mara O’Brien; Tannin Schmidt; Sumit Yadav
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists, Volume 14, Issue 6p578, Published: December 2025
0 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
Automated Indentation Demonstrates Structural Stiffness of Femoral Articular Cartilage and Temporomandibular Joint Mandibular Condylar Cartilage Is Altered in FgF2KO Mice
Paige S. Woods; Alyssa A. Morin; Po-Jung Chen; Sarah Mahonski; Liping Xiao; Marja Hurley; Sumit Yadav; Tannin A. Schmidt
CARTILAGE. October 2020. doi:10.1177/1947603520962565
5 citations · 1 en 2025–2026
A Col1a2 Mutation Reveals Bone Fragility, Hyperelasticity of Skin and Degeneration of Articular Cartilage in Mice
S. Sim; A. Blease; M. Garon; E. Quenneville; P. Potter
Poster SUN-053. American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 22 Sep 2019, Orlando, Florida, USA
Automated Indentation of Femoral and Temporomandibular Joints for Characterization of Cartilage Tissue Quality in Fgf2 KO Mice.
Poster SAT-996. American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 21 Sep 2019, Orlando, Florida, USA
Biomechanical and biochemical outcomes of porcine temporomandibular joint disc deformation
Andrea M. Matuska; Stephen Muller; M.Franklin Dolwick; Peter S. McFetridge
Archives of Oral Biology. 64, 2016, 72–79
24 citations · 3 en 2025–2026
Cartilage Stiffness and Thickness Distributions Revealed by an Automated Indentation Technique in the Temporomandibular Joint
Sim S; Matuska A; Garon M; Quenneville E; McFetridge P; Buschmann MD
TMJ Bioengineering Conference - V, September 12-13, 2016, Barcelona, Spain
Development of a Sequence of Mechanical Tests for Articular Cartilage at a Single Location
Sim S; Chartrand A; Lavallee AP; Tessier J; Garon M; Quenneville E; Buschmann MD
Orthopeadic Research Society Annual Meeting in Orlando, 2016
Engineered microporosity: enhancing the early regenerative potential of decellularized temporomandibular joint discs
Cassandra M. Juran; M. Franklin Dolwick; Peter S. McFetridge
Tissue Engineering Part A. 2015;21(3–4):829–839.
42 citations · 3 en 2025–2026
Sensitivity of quantitative UTE MRI to the biomechanical property of the temporomandibular joint disc
Won C. Bae; Reni Biswas; Sheronda Statum; Robert L. Sah; Christine B. Chung
Skeletal radiology. 2014;43(9):1217-1223.
10 citations · 2 en 2025–2026
Shear mechanics of the TMJ disc - relationship to common clinical observations
Juran CM; Dolwick MF; McFetridge PS
J Dent Res. 2013 Feb, 92(2):193-8.
Magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint disc: feasibility of novel quantitative magnetic resonance evaluation using histologic and biomechanical reference standards
Sanal HT; Bae WC; Pauli C; Du J; Statum S; Znamirowski R; Sah RL; Chung CB
Journal of Orofacial Pain. 2011;25(4)
20 citations · 1 en 2025–2026
A fibril-network-reinforced biphasic model of cartilage in unconfined compression
J. Soulhat; M. D. Buschmann; A. Shirazi-Adl
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Jun, 121(3), 340-347. (1999)
250 citations · 9 en 2025–2026
FAQ
Qu'est-ce que la poroelasticité?+
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle poroélastique en compression non-confinée – Paramètres
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle poroélastique en compression confinée – Paramètres
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle poroélastique en compression confinée – Exemple
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle poroélastique en compression non-confinée – Cartilage
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle poroélastique en compression non-confinée – Exemple
LAB MODULE – Torsion of Disk-Shaped Samples – Student Version
Comment fonctionne le modèle poroélastique en compression confinée "Poroelastic Model in Confined Compression"?+
This model is well adapted for the mechanical characterization of samples containing a liquid fraction and a solid matrix, for example: cartilage or gel samples. A user license is required in order to obtain the results of the poroelastic model in confined compression (Software Add-On, contact Biomomentum to obtain your license).
Mechanical properties can be obtained from the stress relaxation curves obtained under confined compression such as the aggregate modulus (HA) and the hydraulic permeability (k). The aggregate modulus is a measure of stiffness of the sample at equilibrium while the hydraulic permeability is the ability of the fluid to flow through the cartilage matrix.
For example, (Figure 2) shows parameters used for the “Stress Relaxation” function in a confined compression testing protocol on human cartilage disks. Corresponding results are shown in (Figure 1).
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle poroélastique en compression confinée – Paramètres
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle poroélastique en compression confinée – Exemple
Comment fonctionne le modèle poroélastique en compression non-confinée "Poroelastic Model in Unconfined Compression"?+
The nonhomogeneous composite model (i.e. linear fibril-network-reinforced biphasic model) is an extension of the previously developed isotropic homogeneous biphasic model, and was achieved by reinforcing the latter with a network of nonlinear fibrils distributed homogeneously in the r, θ, z directions and which resist extension only (Figure 2). The isotropic matrix is described by the drained elastic constants Em (Young’s modulus), vm(Poisson’s ratio) and a hydraulic permeability k. The fibril network is described by the Young’s modulus of individual fibrils ef which, combined with a fibril volume fraction χ (fibrils volume/ total-volume), results in an equivalent tensile modulus of the fibril network, Ef = 1/3 χ ef (since 1/3 of the fibrils are oriented in each of three mutually orthogonal directions).
For example, (Figure 3) shows parameters used for the “Stress Relaxation” function in an unconfined compression testing protocol on ovine cartilage disks. Corresponding results are shown in (Figure 1).
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle poroélastique en compression non-confinée – Paramètres
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle poroélastique en compression non-confinée – Cartilage
Mach-1 Analysis – Modèle poroélastique en compression non-confinée – Exemple
