Skip to content

Bilayer Implants: Electromechanical Assessment of Regenerated Articular Cartilage in a Sheep Model

  • by garon@biomomentum.com

Jan C. Schagemann; Nicola Rudert; Michelle E. Taylor; Sotcheadt Sim; Eric Quenneville; Martin Garon; Mathias Klinger; Michael D. Buschmann; Hagen Mittelstaedt
Cartilage. 2016 Oct; 7(4): 346-60. .

https://doi.org/10.1177/1947603515623992

Objective

To compare the regenerative capacity of 2 distinct bilayer implants for the restoration of osteochondral defects in a preliminary sheep model.

Methods

Critical sized osteochondral defects were treated with a novel biomimetic poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) implant (Treatment No. 2; n = 6) or a combination of Chondro-Gide and Orthoss (Treatment No. 1; n = 6). At 19 months postoperation, repair tissue (n = 5 each) was analyzed for histology and biochemistry. Electromechanical mappings (Arthro-BST) were performed ex vivo.

Results

Histological scores, electromechanical quantitative parameter values, dsDNA and sGAG contents measured at the repair sites were statistically lower than those obtained from the contralateral surfaces. Electromechanical mappings and higher dsDNA and sGAG/weight levels indicated better regeneration for Treatment No. 1. However, these differences were not significant. For both treatments, Arthro-BST revealed early signs of degeneration of the cartilage surrounding the repair site. The International Cartilage Repair Society II histological scores of the repair tissue were significantly higher for Treatment No. 1 (10.3 ± 0.38 SE) compared to Treatment No. 2 (8.7 ± 0.45 SE). The parameters cell morphology and vascularization scored highest whereas tidemark formation scored the lowest.

Conclusion

There was cell infiltration and regeneration of bone and cartilage. However, repair was incomplete and fibrocartilaginous. There were no significant differences in the quality of regeneration between the treatments except in some histological scoring categories. The results from Arthro-BST measurements were comparable to traditional invasive/destructive methods of measuring quality of cartilage repair.

Equipment used

The Benchtop Arthro-BST was used ex vivo for electromechanical mapping of treated and untreated contralateral sheep femoral condyles. Manual compression with camera registration provided site-specific quantitative parameter (QP) values. Reference-based diagnostic maps assessed cartilage repair and degeneration around the repair sites.

Materials (2)

Test configurations (1)

Products (1)

See Research in Action

Explore case studies

Report a problem with this page

Your email is used only to follow up on this report.

Screenshots (optional)

Click this area and paste a screenshot, or drag files here. Up to 3 PNG, JPEG or WebP images; 5 MB per image. Hide confidential information first.

Please do not include passwords or customer information. Reports and screenshots are private.