Viscoelastic properties of collagen hydrogels

Drouin Bernard; L�vesque Lucie; Lain� Audrey; Rosella Erica; Loy Caroline; Mantovani Diego
Poster #P.0890 on Thursday, May 19 from 15:00 to 16:30 in room 220BCD (P5) during World Biomaterials Congress, Montreal, May 2016

https://doi.org/10.3389/conf.fbioe.2016.01.00535

1 citation · 1 en 2025–2026

Les titres, résumés et légendes des publications sont présentés en anglais.

Introduction: Because of their exceptional biological properties, reconstituted collagen gels are widely used as scaffolds even though their low elastic modulus (~ 500 Pa) limits their applications[1],[2]. The mechanical properties of collagen are governed by viscoelasticity. Unfortunately, few reports deal the mechanical properties of hydrogels that need to be addressed to understand the behavior of suchhydrogels when submitted to either creep-like or relaxation-like mechanical testing.

Materials and Methods: Type I collagen was extracted from rat-tail tendons and solubilized in acetic acid solution (0.02N) at 4 g/L as previously reported[3]. Unconfined compression tests were made on disk shaped samples with a 25 mm compression plate attached to a 150 gf load cell mounted on a Biomomentum Mach 1 (Laval, Canada) testing apparatus. Compression tests were performed at room temperature in Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS) solution. Viscoelastic models[4] based on two time constants Maxwell and standard linear solid were used. In addition, to reconcile experimental results and theory nonlinear stress-strain relationship based on Neo-Hookean and Mooney-Rivlin models were used.

Results: Figure 1 shows a typical multiple relaxation test obtained with three samples: a water drop, a native collagen hydrogel and a collagen gel that has been colonized with smooth muscle cells for one week. The load of the water drop is increasingly oriented toward the tension side (negative) of the load curve due to increased surface tension force. The load curve of the native collagen gel is almost neutral and slightly toward the negative part. This indicates that the collagen native hydrogel exhibits no real residual stress when compressed for many steps. The viscoelastic model of such a material necessitates the use of Maxwell bodies. The other curve shows a residual stress that increases with the depth of the compression. In this case, the standard linear solid viscoelastic model is used.