Aller au contenu

Viscoelastic Properties of Bioprinted Alginate Microbeads Compared to Their Bulk Hydrogel Analogs

  • par garon@biomomentum.com

Cassandra L. Roberge; David M. Kingsley; Lexie R. Cornely; Connor J. Spain; Aiyana G. Fortin; David T. Corr
J Biomech Eng. Paper No: BIO-22-1157, Published: September 23, 2022

https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4055757

19 citations · 13 en 2025–2026

Les titres, résumés et légendes des publications sont présentés en anglais.

Abstract
Hydrogel microbeads are engineered spherical microgels, widely used for biomedical applications in cell cultures, tissue engineering, and drug delivery. Their mechanical and physical properties (i.e., modulus, porosity, diffusion) heavily influence their utility, affecting encapsulated cellular behavior, biopayload elution kinetics, and stability for longer-term cultures. Hence, these properties need to be quantified to guide microbead design for effective application. However, there are few techniques with the μN-level resolution required to evaluate these relatively small, compliant constructs. To circumvent mechanically testing individual microbeads, researchers often approximate microbead properties by characterizing larger bulk gel analogs of the same material formulation. This approach provides some insight into the hydrogel properties; however, bulk gels possess key structural and mechanical differences compared to their microbead equivalents, which may limit their accuracy and utility as analogs for estimating microbead properties. Herein, we explore how microbead properties are influenced by hydrogel formulation (i.e., alginate concentration, divalent cation crosslinker, and crosslinker concentration), and whether these trends are accurately reflected in bulk gel analogs. To accomplish this, we utilize laser direct-write bioprinting to create 12×12 arrays of alginate microbeads, and characterize all 144 microbeads in parallel using a commercially available micro-compression system. In this way, the compressive load is distributed across a large number of beads, thus amplifying sample signal. Comparing microbead properties to those of their bulk gel analogs, we found that trends in modulus, porosity, and diffusion with hydrogel formulation are consistent, yet bulk gels exhibit significant discrepancies in their measured values.
Keywords:
Bioprinting, Hydrogels, Viscoelasticity, Diffusion (Physics), Porosity, Biomedicine, Compression, Design, Drug delivery systems, Lasers, Resolution (Optics), Signals, Stability, Stress, Testing, Tissue engineering

Utilisation des équipements

Un système commercial de microcompression a caractérisé des microbilles d’alginate bio-imprimées par laser en matrices de 12×12, en testant les 144 billes en parallèle. La répartition de la charge de compression sur la matrice amplifiait le signal de l’échantillon pour la comparaison avec des hydrogels massifs analogues. Le résumé disponible n’identifie ni le fabricant ni le modèle ; l’attribution au Mach-1 Mechanical Tester reste non vérifiée.

Article et documents

Matériaux (1)

Découvrez la recherche en pratique

Découvrez les études de cas

Report a problem with this page

Your email is used only to follow up on this report.

Screenshots (optional)

Click this area and paste a screenshot, or drag files here. Up to 3 PNG, JPEG or WebP images; 5 MB per image. Hide confidential information first.

Please do not include passwords or customer information. Reports and screenshots are private.