Aller au contenu

High toughness resorbable brushite-gypsum fiber-reinforced cements

  • par garon@biomomentum.com

Hanan Moussa; Amir El Hadad; Stylianos Sarrigiannidis; Ahmed Saad; Min Wang; Doaa Taqi; Faez Saleh Al-Hamed; Manuel Salmerón-Sánchez; Marta Cerruti; Faleh Tamimi
Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2021, 112205, ISSN 0928-4931, .

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.112205

8 citations · 0 en 2025–2026

Les titres, résumés et légendes des publications sont présentés en anglais.

Abstract
The ideal bone substitute material should be mechanically strong, biocompatible with a resorption rate matching the rate of new bone formation. Brushite (dicalcium phosphate dihydrate) cement is a promising bone substitute material but with limited resorbability and mechanical properties. To improve the resorbability and mechanical performance of brushite cements, we incorporated gypsum (calcium sulfate dihydrate) and diazonium-treated polyglactin fibers which are well-known for their biocompatibility and bioresorbability. Here we show that by combining brushite and gypsum, we were able to fabricate biocompatible composite cements with high fracture toughness (0.47 MPa·m1/2) and a resorption rate that matched the rate of new bone formation. Adding functionalized polyglactin fibers to this composite cement further improved the fracture toughness up to 1.00 MPa·m1/2. XPS and SEM revealed that the improvement in fracture toughness is due to the strong interfacial bonding between the functionalized fibers and the cement matrix. This study shows that adding gypsum and functionalized polyglactin fibers to brushite cements results in composite biomaterials that combine high fracture toughness, resorbability, and biocompatibility, and have great potential for bone regeneration.
Keywords: Brushite; gypsum cements; polyglactin fibers; fracture toughness; resorbability; diazonium treatment

Utilisation des équipements

Le résumé disponible traite de la caractérisation de la ténacité à la rupture de ciments brushite–gypse renforcés par des fibres de polyglactine fonctionnalisées. Il ne précise ni l’appareil d’essai mécanique ni la configuration de l’essai de rupture. Les éléments fournis ne permettent donc pas d’attribuer ces mesures à un Mach-1 Mechanical Tester.

Matériaux (2)

Découvrez la recherche en pratique

Découvrez les études de cas

Report a problem with this page

Your email is used only to follow up on this report.

Screenshots (optional)

Click this area and paste a screenshot, or drag files here. Up to 3 PNG, JPEG or WebP images; 5 MB per image. Hide confidential information first.

Please do not include passwords or customer information. Reports and screenshots are private.