Caroline D. Hoemann; Jessica Guzmán-Morales; Geneviève Picard; Gaoping Chen; Daniel Veilleux; Anik Chevrier; Sotcheadt Sim; Martin Garon; Eric Quenneville; Charles-Hubert Lafantaisie-Favreau; Michael D. Buschmann; Mark B. Hurtig
Materialia, 2020, 100609, ISSN 2589-1529, .
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2020.100609
6 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
Les titres, résumés et légendes des publications sont présentés en anglais.
Keywords: Articular cartilage repair, Biomaterials, Bone remodeling, Animal models, Structural stiffness, Angiogenesis
Utilisation des équipements
Le Mach-1 évaluait le cartilage réparé par indentation selon la normale locale, calculée à partir de la position d’essai et de quatre détections de surface voisines.
Figures

Figure 1 — Show caption
Mechanical and biochemical analyses of cartilage repair tissues and matching LFC intact cartilage at 9 months post-operative. Osteochondral biopsies with measured (A) cartilage tissue thickness were submitted to unconfined compression to measure (B) Em, (C), Ef and (D) permeability coefficient, (E) sGAG content (μg/mg wet weight) was obtained from adjacent biochemical biopsies. (F) SS@100 μm (N/s) values from automated indentation mapping throughout the regions shown in blue directly below (defect, paradefect MFC, MFC outer regions and LFC). Example stress-relaxation curves from indentation analyses of representative test sites: GAG-depleted paradefect MFC cartilage (G), exposed bone in a defect test site (H), hyaline-like cartilage repair tissue (I, treated defect), and intact LFC cartilage (J; LFC histology was not available therefore the LFC test site is shown on a color map of the interpolated log-scale SS@100 μm data points superposed at 60% transparency over this treated defect knee image (dark blue = 0.1 N/mm, red = 20 N/mm); In panels (G–J), black dots in macroscopic images: indentation test sites; red arrows: test site shown in the panel; blue arrowheads: cartilage defect boundaries; black arrows: area of sGAG depletion; scale bars are 2.5 mm. Abbreviations: LFC: lateral femoral condyle; MFC: medial femoral condyle; SS: structural stiffness; N: Newton; mm: millimeter. Data in (A–E) show the median ± quartiles (box) ± min/max (whiskers) ( N = 5) and overall mean (grey horizontal line, N = 20). Data in (F) show individual SS@100 μm datapoints collected from 5 distal femurs in the specified test areas ( N = 2 to N = 14 indentation measures per condyle per area). The corresponding median (90% confidence interval) of the combined control and treated test sites is given below.
Caroline D. Hoemann, Jessica Guzman-Morales, Genevieve Picard, Gaoping Chen, Daniel Veilleux, Anik Chevrier, Sotcheadt Sim, Martin Garon, Eric Quenneville, Charles-Hubert Lafantaisie-Faverau, Michael D. Buschmann and Mark B. Hurtig — Figure 6
Matériaux (1)
