Lin Zhu; Martin Garon; Éric Quenneville; Michael D. Buschmann; Pierre Savard
Journal of Biomechanics, 49(14), 3587-3591. (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.09.008
6 citations · 1 en 2025–2026
Les titres, résumés et légendes des publications sont présentés en anglais.
Electroarthrography (EAG) is a new technique formeasuring electrical potentials appearing on the knee surface during loadingthat reflects cartilage quality and joint contact force. Our objective was toinvestigate the evolution of EAG signals during successive loading cycles. Thestudy was conducted on 20 standing subjects who shifted their body weight toachieve knee loading. Their EAG signals were recorded during 10 successiveloading cycles, and during a subsequent sequence of 10 cycles recorded after a15 min exercise period. Multiple linear regression models estimated theelectro-mechanical ratio (EMR) interpreting the ability of cartilage togenerate a certain potential for a given ground reaction force by taking intoaccount this force and the center of pressure displacements during unipedalstance. The results showed that the EMR values slowly decreased with successivecycles: during the initial sequence, the correlation coefficients between EMRvalues and sequence numbers were significant at 3 of the 4 electrode sites (P<0.05); for the post-exercise sequence, the EMR values still decreased and were significantly lower than during the initial sequence (P<0.001). The reduction of EMR values could arise from muscle activity and habituation of the stretch reflex, and also from the time dependent electromechanical properties of cartilage. In conclusion, refraining from physical activity before the EAG measurements is important to improve measurement repeatability because of the EMR decrease. The electromechanical model confirmed the role of EAG as a natural sensor of the changes in the knee contact force and also improved EAG measurement accuracy.
Utilisation des équipements
L’électroarthrographie a enregistré les potentiels électriques induits par la mise en charge à la surface du genou pendant que les participants debout transféraient leur poids au cours de cycles successifs. Les mesures ont été comparées avant et après exercice. Les extraits disponibles décrivent cette approche de mesure en surface, mais n’identifient pas Arthro-BST comme dispositif d’enregistrement et n’établissent aucun protocole Arthro-BST.
Article et documents
Document
Consulter dans PubMed
Document
Consulter dans ResearchGate
Matériaux (2)

Matériau
Cartilage articulaire

Configurations de test (1)
Configuration de test
