Aller au contenu

Comparative study on complexes formed by chitosan and different polyanions: Potential of chitosan-pectin biomaterials as scaffolds in tissue engineering

  • par garon@biomomentum.com

Fernanda Carla Bombaldi de Souza; Renata Francielle Bombaldi de Souza; Bernard Drouin; Diego Mantovani; Ângela Maria Moraes
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, Volume 132, 1 July 2019, Pages 178-189

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.187

47 citations · 7 en 2025–2026

Les titres, résumés et légendes des publications sont présentés en anglais.

Polyelectrolyte complexes of chitosan (Ch) and pectin (Pc) or alginate (Alg) were produced in the presence or absence of the silicone gel Silpuran® 2130 A/B (Sil) and the surfactant Kolliphor® P188 (Kol). Ch-Pc-Kol-based formulations presented higher porosity (up to 83.3%) and thickness (maximum of 2273.5 μm in PBS). Lower water contact angle was observed for Ch-Alg formulations (minimum of 36.8°) and these formulations presented higher swelling and mass loss in PBS (reaching up to 21.7 g/g and 80.4%, respectively). The addition of Sil to the matrices improved their elastic moduli, reaching a maximum of 4-fold change at 40% strain. The use of pectin instead of alginate augmented the elastic moduli, reaching 66 and 4-fold changes for dense and porous formulations, respectively. Pectin-containing scaffolds presented poroviscoelasticity, a typical mechanical feature of many soft tissues. The suitability of the materials for tissue engineering applications was demonstrated in terms of stability upon degradation in culture medium or lysozyme solution, as well as lack of cytotoxicity. This study evidences the potential of Ch-Pc-based materials to be further explored for this purpose, especially to improve the mechanical properties of chitosan-based scaffolds aiming medical applications.

Utilisation des équipements

L’étude comparait des échafaudages de chitosane–pectine et de chitosane–alginate, notamment des formulations contenant un gel de silicone ou un tensioactif, pour l’ingénierie tissulaire. La caractérisation mécanique portait sur les modules d’élasticité et le comportement poroviscoélastique. Le résumé disponible ne précise ni l’appareil ni le protocole de chargement et n’établit aucun rôle du Mach-1 Mechanical Tester.

Matériaux (2)

Configurations de test (1)

Découvrez la recherche en pratique

Découvrez les études de cas

Report a problem with this page

Your email is used only to follow up on this report.

Screenshots (optional)

Click this area and paste a screenshot, or drag files here. Up to 3 PNG, JPEG or WebP images; 5 MB per image. Hide confidential information first.

Please do not include passwords or customer information. Reports and screenshots are private.