Michelle Griffin; Yaami Premakumar; Alexander Seifalian; Peter Edward Butler; Matthew Szarko
Journal of Visualized Experiments : JoVE. 2016;(118):54872. .
123 citations · 21 en 2025–2026
Les titres, résumés et légendes des publications sont présentés en anglais.
Abstract
Regenerative medicine aims to engineer materials to replace or restore damaged or diseased organs. The mechanical properties of such materials should mimic the human tissues they are aiming to replace; to provide the required anatomical shape, the materials must be able to sustain the mechanical forces they will experience when implanted at the defect site. Although the mechanical properties of tissue-engineered scaffolds are of great importance, many human tissues that undergo restoration with engineered materials have not been fully biomechanically characterized. Several compressive and tensile protocols are reported for evaluating materials, but with large variability it is difficult to compare results between studies. Further complicating the studies is the often destructive nature of mechanical testing. Whilst an understanding of tissue failure is important, it is also important to have knowledge of the elastic and viscoelastic properties under more physiological loading conditions.
This report aims to provide a minimally destructive protocol to evaluate the compressive and tensile properties of human soft tissues. As examples of this technique, the tensile testing of skin and the compressive testing of cartilage are described. These protocols can also be directly applied to synthetic materials to ensure that the mechanical properties are similar to the native tissue. Protocols to assess the mechanical properties of human native tissue will allow a benchmark by which to create suitable tissue-engineered substitutes.
Keywords: Bioengineering, Issue 118, compression, tensile, indentation, cartilage, skin, biomechanics, biomaterial, regenerative medicine, tissue engineering
Utilisation des équipements
Le résumé disponible décrit un protocole peu destructif pour les essais de traction sur la peau humaine et de compression sur le cartilage humain. Il ne précise ni l’équipement utilisé ni le rôle du Mach-1 Mechanical Tester; son utilisation et la configuration de compression ne peuvent donc pas être vérifiées.
Article et documents
Document
Consulter dans PubMed Central
Matériaux (2)

Matériau
Cartilage articulaire

Matériau
Peau
Configurations de test (2)
Configuration de test
Tension
Configuration de test