Ali Borazjani; Benjamin C. Weed; Sourav S. Patnaik; Jean M. Feugang; David Christiansen; Steven H. Elder; Peter L. Ryan; Jun Liao
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 204(4), 365. e325-365. e336. (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.003
18 citations · 0 en 2025–2026
Les titres, résumés et légendes des publications sont présentés en anglais.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to biomechanically characterize and compare human, porcine, equine, and ovine fetal membranes.
STUDY DESIGN: Noncontact metrology was used for topographic analyses. Uniaxial tensile testing was performed to resolve specific biomechanical values. Puncture force and radial stresses were determined with biaxial puncture testing. Microstructure and surface tortuosity were analyzed histologically.
RESULTS: Equine and human membranes sustained larger magnitude loading, but ovine and porcine membranes exhibited stronger material properties. Biaxial puncture validated uniaxial results; human and equine groups accommodated the largest loads but lowest stresses. Equine embranes were mostly vascularized; tortuosity was highest in porcine membranes. Species' gestation length was correlated positively with membrane thickness.
CONCLUSION: The anatomy of placentation and length of species gestation show distinct relationships to membrane biomechanics. Unlike other species, human fetal membranes do not compensate for structural weakness with a thicker membrane. This finding may explain the high incidence of preterm premature rupture of membranes in humans.
Utilisation des équipements
Le Mach-1 réalisait des essais de traction uniaxiale et de perforation biaxiale sur des membranes fœtales à terme d’origine humaine, porcine, équine et ovine.
Matériaux (1)
Matériau
Membranes fœtales
Configurations de test (2)
Configuration de test
Tension
Configuration de test